Opinion: People are not designed to tolerate 5G waves
A biochemist said its untested rollout was ‘the stupidest idea anyone has had in the history of the world’
But he stops short of looking beyond the commercial interest of EE to the wider scientific community, which has been ringing alarm bells about the damage being caused to human, animal, insect and plant life by wireless technology for several years.
In 2015, 240 scientists appealed to the UN and WHO for safety reforms and for fibre-optic broadband in schools rather than wireless connectivity.
The use of 4G, never mind 5G networks, has been associated with drastic bird and insect losses, sperm and testicular damage in men, bee colony collapse and disruption to the electrical activity of the human brain, especially among children.
5G does not just mean ‘5th generation’. It means that far higher radio frequencies than those generated by 4G networks will saturate our cities, towns and villages. (4G networks use frequencies below 6GHz, 5G networks use frequencies in the 30GHz – 300GHz range).
Humans and other living creatures have evolved in levels of radio frequency radiation far below those produced by technology today.
We are not designed to tolerate such high levels of radio frequency, nor are the other creatures with whom we share this planet.
It is scandalous that while the Conservative government commissioned a report from Deloitte on the economic and social impact of mobile broadband and 5G technology, no such reports have been commissioned to establish the adverse environmental and health implications of this technology.
In the words of Martin Pall, Emeritus Professor of Biochemistry at Washington State University: “Putting in tens of millions of 5G antennae without a single biological test for safety has got to be about the stupidest idea anyone has had in the history of the world.”
Source: Somerset Live
Video: The EMF Guy
Sometimes you just have to ask yourself: WHAT ARE THE CHANCES OF THAT ? – #watcot